This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
The following two criticism should be removed as wp:NOR unless the can be sourced.
Certain aspects of DBT are subject to debate, including the rule that states, "Any individual who misses four consecutive DBT meetings can no longer work with their preassigned DBT therapist, no matter how long they have been working together." Although this rule is intended to encourage participation, Peer Counselors and Disability Advocates like Raquel Santiago, a certified peer counselor and first responder in San Francisco, argue that this rule tends to penalize patients unfairly, since even hospitalizations for medical purposes are not exempt.[citation needed]
Additionally, learning and remembering the counter-intuitive acronyms used to label the modules can pose a challenge to people who suffer from cognitive processing delays caused by either medication, the symptoms of their diagnosis, or other organic functioning issues.[citation needed]
Nice job on the article. I have only one complaint. You removed the underlines from the characters making up the acronyms. I think they were useful and would like to restore them. -- Cdw ♥'s ♪ ♫(talk)02:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do DBT, and the "4 misses in a row" is a real rule, but it's oversimplified here. I don't think it happens as much as the critic makes it sound. DBT therapists don't just drop people as clients, there's interventions in place to prevent 4 misses in a row like using phone coaching and addressing commitment to the program. Clients start knowing the rule before starting phase 1 and agree to it, and if there's concerns, the therapist is trained to address it. I think I have too much COI to make any edits myself on this page. In Marsha Linehan's memoir, she addresses critiques herself as it was challenging to establish the treatment, so that could be a good place to start and then find independent sources that explain it.
I believe I’ve read something to that effect in Brodsky & Stanley, but it’s not showing up in my PDF search right now. I might do a more in-depth look later. Artoria2e5🌉00:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actus Reas personality issues with mens rea, identified by sadomasochistic modus operandi immunities (tort reform) and the secondary element "materialism" solution; Theft by proxy, Theft of service, no duty to warn. Insurance and other law coercion crime, post therapy negligence automatism substantiate, patient has to love Modus vivendi. Personal being a head injury, attacked on the job for a month, I suffer from advancing nerve damage from the coercion ( group therapy, re-educate, edification) therapy, to commit. I personally was expect to, and still expected to inchoate suicidal terror as an American dialectical solution. Medical malpractice where care immunities are supreme, I was attack and place again on the 911 terror Atta path in houston. The risk of estoppel "make to", of national social, legal, political, religion catastrophe, in other word promotes free for all in a world context. The theism theory of making occult and world satin church (making abortions complete ) immune, lose on earth is a prophecy fulfilled. All philosophies said to kill pure thought (Christ) for dialectical materialism. An the endocannibalism effective problem of the therapy does not include Folie A Deux imposee worship, death religion, Class need of a people source (), commercial tortfeasing, malfeasance, malpractice, drug use to become disordered, getting off to "it" is along term effect of experience, damage to self and public (endocannibalism insatiable need), see patient every where, The occult practice of loving persons "IT" (genius) for accessible evil genius, act the role you are the act, going after 6 degree of separation, family, friends...I have seen more negative of the practice. And the problem started as negative frequency dependent selection and dependent on illegal immigration aphasia automatic psychological defenses, the evil genius working in the innocent, biblical antiquity NOS personalities named demon, devil, satin.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.5.68.81 (talk) 18:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I skimmed most of the lead and still couldn't tell you how DBT works, what the steps are, etc. I think that info should be front and center, in the first or second sentence. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
